Religiously motivated violence

Archbishop Justin Welby at Lambeth Palace

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has given a considered lecture on aspects of religiously motivated violence, entitled

‘The Abolition of the Global – Learning to Live in the World in One City’

Amongst other things he calls the idea of "a war of civilizations" a dangerous myth, which I would heartily endorse.

The phrase is largely intended to reinforce 'us' as the good guys against an amorphous 'them', the enemy. It suggests a gulf which isn't there, and boundaries which don't exist.

His argument is based in part on an understanding of the way the world has changed:

let us start with reflecting on the nature of electronic media. Electronic media makes everything local. The global has been abolished, ...

What was once something happening to some stranger on the other side of the world is now happening to a friend of a friend on Facebook. 

When we face each other, deeply and sincerely, we begin to catch a glimpse of our creation, our Creator, and thus our shared humanity. 

However, at present the result of digitisation is

diversity but without facing each other. 

He goes on to put a lot of emphasis on "facing one another." which "enables us to perceive selfhood in others. To see that the person we're looking at is a human being of infinite dignity." He cites a Church of England project called Near Neighbours intended

to bring people together who are near neighbours in communities that are religiously and ethnically diverse, so that they can get to know each other better, build relationships of trust and collaborate together on initiatives that improve the local community they live in.

In sum, a consequence of digitization and digital communication is both centralization and centripetalism: it brings together and creates new divisions, it crosses old boundaries and reinforces old ones. In particular religion (implicitly replacing nationalism) becomes the plane on which the 'outsider' is identified and which 'justifies' violence - itself facilitated and intensified by the same changes in technology.

Therefore, the Archbishop's proposal is, effectively, that those seeking peace and mutual respect in our differences must themselves also dissolve the old language and seek new ways and words. We need a "narrative ...underpinned by a commitment to human flourishing." which is not bounded by the old lines of religious division.

In turn this entails a need for a new literacy on matters of faith amongst governmental players.
----

When I began this post I had not intended to simply summarise the Archbishop's lecture - better to read it in full - but I found on more careful reading that I agreed with him  more than I expected.

However I think his references to economic and political forces too slight (accepting it wasn't his theme), They remain powerful and self-serving, marginalising far too many people. I also think that whatever eventually emerges won't be quite what anyone had planned or campaigned for.

ISIS's apocalyptic theology is such that it cannot listen to outsiders. Christians should be able to understand this because Christianity holds the same capacity for such thinking. In the short-term violence seems likely to grow rather than diminish.

And it is precisely because the task seems so great, the violence so horrific, the ideology so absolute that we need to re-affirm the value of love in public policy: respect, affirmation of, consideration for strangers and enemies solely because we are all children of God. Somehow face-to-face valuing of the person in front of us needs to be translated to digital communication and global ordering.

A scene from religiously motivated violence in Egypt